CHILD PROTECTION IN FINLAND, ILLEGAL ADOPTIONS, CUSTODYS I.E. DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTIES AND FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN FINLAND

I'm writing this about Finnish child protection because I want to help others who find themselves in the same situation and make it clear to other countries what is happening in Finland.

In the 21st century, child protection issues have gone from bad to worse, and child protection has become an international business in Finland.

Those who have experienced the horrors of child protection grow weary and most withdraw. Those for whom the situation is current either do not dare to speak or do not have the resources. I am writing this without telling anyone's name. Social workers do not want their names to be made public, even if it would be reasonable for the names to be made public and for them to face the shame they have caused. Taking kids is also seen as shameful, as if you are somehow a bad mother or father. My son has said that I am a good mother and the other friends of my son who are in taken by social workers have also told their other friends that my son's mother is a wonderful person,

My son is currently 28 years old, but if I am lucky enough to have a grandchild one day and become a grandmother, I don't want the same to happen to my grandchild. However, my son has said that he doesn't want a child because he doesn't want the same thing done to him. It is common knowledge that child welfare also stalks and persecutes the offspring.  Even though I got rid of child protection years ago, it's still sad. I believe that people have already had enough of Finland's child protection, because I have seen many articles on the internet in which e.g. that Finland is an oppressive country where you don't dare to have children when every child is taken. It's time to stop this madness.

Finland would need an impartial court that respects human rights and that would immediately investigate human rights violations and illegal detentions. There is an Administrative Court in Finland where you can file a complaint, but it is not an impartial court and the Administrative Court will almost never overturn a custody order. The decision of the Administrative Court can be appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court and only then to the EU Court of Justice.

Years ago, when Jose Manuel Barroso was the president of the European Union, he wrote on the subject that those countries in the EU that do not comply with EU Article 7 will be moved out of the EU. I myself wrote a direct appeal to Jose Manuel Barrosso and said that Finland's human rights violations and detentions are issues that the EU should intervene in. Finland has been convicted so many times of human rights violations in the EU court that it seems to be the top country in violations.

Article 7:

Suspension clause (Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union)

Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union allows for the possibility of suspending European Union (EU) membership rights (such as voting rights in the Council of the European Union) if a country seriously and persistently breaches the principles on which the EU is founded as defined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities). Nevertheless, that country’s membership obligations remain binding.

In accordance with Article 7, on the proposal of one third of EU Member States, or of the European Parliament or of the European Commission, the Council, acting by a majority of four fifths of its members, having obtained the Parliament’s consent, may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach of these fundamental principles by a Member State, and address appropriate recommendations to it.

The administrative court and the parliamentary ombudsman are equal to nothing, because both have allowed illegal foster care and the arbitrary power of social workers to continue for years.

The EU narrowed the definition of a refugee and the victims of Finnish child protection have refugee status. A refugee is defined as someone who has a justified reason to fear being persecuted because of race, religion, nationality, belonging to a certain social group or political opinion and is unable or unwilling due to fear to take refuge in the protection of their home country. In the EU's new interpretation, persecution carried out by an entity other than the state is persecution only if it is permitted by the authorities. When the authorities are unable to protect, it must be taken into account whether such inability is intentional.

The human rights problems caused by child protection are caused by the ideology of ``best interests of the child'', which is marketed by e.g. with a slogan about the conflict between the interests of the child and the parent. The ideology includes the fact that the child's interests come before everything else, and instead of the police, a separate organization is needed to protect them, which has a special right to interpret the child's interests as an internal cult in which everyone believes. Glorifying the rights of any group - for example children - always leads to human rights violations, especially if the rights can only be defined by an official who has adopted the ideology, and not by the legal subject, i.e. the child himself.

If the interests and rights of all family members are not taken into account, the child's rights will not be realized either. Therefore, child protection decisions should be transferred from social workers and boards to impartial courts. This is required by the European Convention on Human Rights, according to which only an impartial court can decide on the restrictions on the freedom rights of citizens - thus also children. The Human Rights Convention also guarantees family members the right to family life regardless of the child's custody, and the court has seen the restriction of visits as a violation of the Human Rights Convention. The authority should also have an active family reunification plan.

For us, visitation restrictions are the rule rather than the exception, and it is common that efforts are made to separate the child from his parents, and reunification is not even thought of. The social worker decides on custody and visitation restrictions, as if it were not an administrative deprivation of liberty for the child and restriction of family life.

*

My son's birth and childhood years

My son was born in 1997 and after the birth I was in the hills of happiness and felt universal love for my son. I was so full of a mother's love for my son that I didn't even notice for three days that my coccyx had been broken during childbirth. My friends had wondered why I was walking with a stoop and after three days I noticed that I couldn't straighten my back and the doctor concluded that the coccyx was broken and told me that some people's coccyx flexes and some people it is stiff and breaks.

I was working and my education is in printing and advertising.

I almost always used private doctors for my son because I could afford it when I was working, and you can get better and more reliable service from private medical centers.

When my son moved to kindergarten while I was working, the kindergarten said that my son's clothes don't need to be marked and named because other children don't have such expensive clothes as my son. I bought a lot of designer clothes. My son was spoiled and the apple of my eye.

For my son's friends, I always offered them food, ice cream, candy, etc. when they came to the visits and played with my son.

I belonged to the Theosophical Order of Service and was the organization's Scandinavian representative. The activities included a lot of defending Human Rights and participating in campaigns. I brought together the Theosophical Order of Service and the Finland-based baby bag Vaaka association, which helps Russian orphanages by supplying them with clothes, toys, woven blankets - similar to Mother Teresa's patchwork blankets, etc. Other campaigns were e.g. Plant flowers, not bombs where we sent flower seeds around the world to be planted. We also made friendship bracelets from threads and they were also sent around the world. In the campaigns, you didn't take anyone's side, but everyone was considered equal. I did not immediately realize that human rights activism might also be dangerous. In addition, I defended the rights of Tibetans and participated in Amnesty's campaigns by writing petitions, and I publicly held a street demonstration in the center of Helsinki with my friend from the Give a hand to free Tibet campaign, when the Chinese noticed our activities and took photos of us.

For those who do not know what theosophy is and what its purpose is, the three tasks of the Theosophical Society are:

1. Forms the core of the universal brotherhood of mankind regardless of race, creed, sex, social class or color.

2. Stimulates the study of comparative religion, philosophy and natural sciences.

3. To study the unknown laws of nature and dormant forces in man.

*

The first child protection notice

The first child protection report about me was made in October 2004.

I received a notification in the mail and a request to come and talk to the Laajasalo office of child protection. I lived in Roihuvuori at the time and the mail arrived in such a way that I would have had less than an hour to go to the appointed time. I tried to call and reach the social worker mentioned in the letter, but he did not answer the phone. According to my place of residence, the matter should have been handled at the Herttoniemi office, which is closer to my home. The matter was not dealt with.

The content of the anonymous child welfare report was that my son walks around in dirty clothes and there is no food at home. This is an announcement made purely for the purpose of bullying. Child protection could have come to my house to look at the contents of the refrigerator and not ask to go to the office for that reason. as for dirty clothes, my son doesn't even agree to wear dirty clothes, he changes them himself and I've never put dirty clothes on him either.

Second child protection notice

Second child protection report was made about me on February 23, 2005. My sister made the report. The content of the announcement was as follows:

"Planning to move to India, Brazil or Peru. Not worried about money, can eat roots for example. At the turn of the year, mother received a retroactive payment from Kela (= National Pension Institute) of approx. 1000 euros to travel to England to Stonehenge. Anyway, interested in paranormel sciences and maybe gone too far with it. Sells things at flea markets. In the fall, the family was asked to come to the office by letter because of a child protection notice, but they didn't come."

The third notification registered with child welfare on 25 February 2005 is my own call. The announcement reads:

"Mother's call. The boy's mother, Tanja, calls and says that his sister has filed an unfounded child protection report. In addition, the sister has threatened to kill Tanja, referring to an unsolved murder in the area, saying that Tanja would be next.

I have told the Administrative Court and the Parliamentary Ombudsman and also child protection how things have really been.  My sister and her husband were alcoholics and drug users and they had a child together. My sister was putting her half-year-old baby in daycare and returning to work in the middle of her maternity leave. I told my sister that it's outrageous that infancy and childhood mean nothing to her and who puts a half-year-old baby in daycare. I also mentioned their and my sister's husband's drug use, which was hard substances. After that, my sister sent an e-mail that there had been a murder in the area and that the victim had been shot in the mouth while he was sleeping and that I would be the next one to be killed.

I called my mother that my sister had sent such a message and my mother said that she knew about it because my sister had come to her place after sending the message. Apparently ran away if reported to the police. At the same time, my mother told me that my sister has made a child protection report about me.

Regarding the rest of the content of the child protection notice, I state that we traveled to England to Stonehenge with the money returned by Kela. I talked face to face with the boy's teacher about whether the boy could be away from school for two days because we would go to England for an extended weekend trip. The teacher said that he is doing well and that the boy has no learning difficulties and is doing well in school. We were in England for four days and stayed in a person's private house with ten rooms and a lovely pink jacuzzi, and the house was in Salisbury near Stonehenge.

I sold unnecessary stuff at the flea market, like almost every family with children sells clothes that are too small, etc. and there is nothing strange or illegal about it.

I am interested in para sciences and yoga and meditate in a Tibetan Buddhist group and participate in the activities of the Theosophical Society. § 11 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights violated:

Freedom of religion and conscience

Everyone has freedom of religion and conscience.

Freedom of religion and conscience includes the right to profess and practice religion, the right to express conviction and the right to belong or not belong to a religious community. No one is obliged to participate in the practice of religion against their conscience.

My sister has tried to come up with reasons to make a child protection report about me out of embarrassment and in the sense of slandering, even though her own family as well as she herself is a complete scumbag who had to be questioned by the police with the baby on suspicion of murder. My sister's husband was caught in front of the crab in the morning while he was going to work. My sister said that she has hired freemason Aarno Arvela as her lawyer. It has also been publicly admitted that freemasons are an undesirable thing in the Finnish justice system and judges should present a declaration of affiliation that they have no relations with freemasons when they judge people.

Fourth child protection notification made on March 1, 2005

"Grandmother's call. The grandmother calls and asks if there is any way to prevent her daughter from taking her son abroad. She says that the daughter sold the family's belongings at the flea market and collected money so that she could move to India, Peru or Brazil. Tanja herself has denied her plans to move. According to the grandmother, the daughter suffers from a bad mental health problem but refuses to go to the doctor. Grandma was told that Tanja is a boy a single parent, so in that sense the mother has the right to move abroad with her son, for example."

10.3.2005

The social worker went behind the door and dropped a handwritten note from the mailbox where she tried to reach me when I wasn't at home.

16.3.2005 announcement:

"The boy's teacher called that the boy had been away from school for a couple of weeks. Nothing has been reported from home and teacher hear from the grandmother that the family is possibly moving to India.

11.5. 2005 Notification

A call from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs about family law matters. Tanja without money at the Finnish embassy in Mexico without money for a plane ticket.

My mother also went to talk to the police and the police had said that people are allowed to travel and they don't go looking.

* * *

So my son and I went to Mexico because I'm interested in the pyramids and the Mayans. I remember when I woke up from the hotel in Mexico the first morning, I felt how happy I was when I got out of Finland. The intention was not to stay there permanently. In Mexico, my son and I went to the amusement park and the nature amusement parks Xelha and Xcaret, where you could swim with dolphins. We also visited the Pyramids Tulum, Teotihuacan, Chichen Itza Copa and Palenque. We spent the most time in Palenque in southern Mexico.

I still have proof and receipts that we have paid entrance fees and eaten regular Mexican food and stayed in hotels and that I have had money to pay for these. We also went to the Maya theater to watch a performance about the Mayan creation story.

We spent a lot of time in a camping area called Mayabell and we had a tent there. I don't know why our tent broke down - whether someone had broken it down or something, but at the same time it started to rain, so we took a bungalow from the Mayabell camping area for the night. In the morning we went to see the broken tent and five Mexican men had gathered around it. I chatted with them and I gave one of them a broken tent and he gladly accepted it. One of the Mexican men started talking to me that in Mexico you can eat herbs and the roots of some plants. He also said that he has been watching us and noticed how happy my son is, that he has been raised well. Then he said that if you give away your children, you can keep all the children in the world as your own.  They said they can play soccer later with my son.

I went back to the bungalow and sat in front of it. After a while, the man to whom I had given the tent came to thank me for the tent, he said Alejandro as his name. I fell in love with him and he wanted to rub my neck and back and that led to me having sex with him.

We spent a couple of days together with him and he suggested that he take me and my son to swim in a nearby river, Aqua Azul, and we drove there in his car. There was also a Mexican woman, his friend. At river, Alejandro put mud clay on his face and said it was Sunscreen and offered it to me. I refused to put clay on my face.  Then she began to provoke and with her long hair hit my hand, as if with a whip. It started to scare me and I tried to just be calm. I suggested that we leave the river to which everyone agreed. We returned to the bungalow and Alejandro said that he would visit in the evening, that we would go to the center of Palenque to eat together. In the evening he arrived and we went to eat by car. When he drove back to Mayabell, he said let's go to another camping site to see that he knows there are other Finns there, I said I don't want to because I wasn't interested in seeing other Finns. However, he stopped at another camping area and said that both of my sons and I should sit in the same front seat of the car. My son and I sat in the front seat and Alejandro drove recklessly. We arrived at Mayabell and sat in front of the bungalow and talked about all kinds of things. Then Alejandro told my son that when you are already a big boy and your beard is already growing he is going to see my son again and then he will say to my son that I knew your Mama. (I knew your mother) I was startled and I don't know if he meant to do something to me at that time, but I kissed him and he calmed down. Then he said and tried to get us to go with him tomorrow to San Cristobal to another camping area. We went to sleep with my son and in the morning when we woke up, my son and I decided that we would go back to Finland when it was so weird speech. Alejandro had left a shirt and a necklace in the bungalow. We packed our things and left with our suitcases to look for Alejandro in the camping area and found him. I said here are your things and that we are going back to Finland. He said don't go back to Finland. Now that you're on vacation, you don't remember what they do to you in Finland. And he enticed us to go to San Cristobal. I hadn't told him anything about what was being done to me in Finland, but he knew about it.

We went to the Finnish consulate in Mexico and there I searched their computer for cheap flights to Finland. They were not found. We contacted my ex-husband and my mother if they can help with the missing 400 euros.  I paid the rest of the plane ticket myself. We went to the hotel and the consulate stayed to find out. The next day, the consulate called that the money had arrived and the plane ticket to Finland was ready. We flew to Finland and the police and social workers caught us at the airport. I was given a note with the basics of urgent care, two pages of paper. In addition, a phone number was given to the woman in Lohja where my son was taken.

The flight from Mexico to Finland had one stopover in Amsterdam. The social workers had written in the police request for official assistance that the mother was coming from Amsterdam with her son, so that it would look like I was coming from the drug circles of Amsterdam even though I came from Mexico.

A couple of days later, a meeting was arranged with the social workers at the Herttoniemi office, and my son and the woman from Lohja with whom my son had been placed also came there. The leading social worker looked like an alcoholic at first sight and that was the first thing that came to mind about his nature.  I later found out from his Facebook profile that he had posted pictures of wine bottles publicly. So my intuition was right. The leading social worker said that child protection had paid the missing part of the plane ticket. He said that child protection had thought that child protection would follow us to Mexico to look for us and that they had also thought about the option of leaving the mother in Mexico and only bringing the son to Finland. So this is a clear violation of human rights right away.

The social worker asked what we had eaten and insisted vehemently that if there is no money, then we eat roots. I said I had enough money to buy food and I would never do anything as crazy as he claims. He also asked about selling at the flea market, to which I stated that I had sold unnecessary items, clothes that were too small, etc., in the Child Protection Notice it was claimed that I had sold my apartment empty of goods, and such a claim should, according to all logic, be verified by coming to my home and checking the matter, but it has never been checked and social workers have not visited my apartment.

The social worker asked about mental health problems, to which I stated that there is nothing and never has been, as long as child protection has been smeared and reasons invented. My mother and sister have never said that I have a mental health problem, but with the death threat, suddenly I am.

After the meeting, I called the woman from Lohja and she told me that I have the right to see all the reports made about me, or else it is a criminal offense.  It turned out that I have not been notified of all the notifications that I only received later.

So until Mexico, I was told about the child protection reports and it is clear that someone had put Alejandro after us. I wouldn't be at all surprised if child protection is behind the story, because the social worker said she thought about the option of going after us. Alejandro either messed up or saved the situation.

* * *

I was at home in Roihuvuori's apartment and my mother came to visit after the trip to Mexico. He immediately started shouting why you came back from Mexico and why you didn't stay in Mexico. My mother hadn't visited my apartment in over a year and she noticed that I had bought a new sofa just before the trip to Mexico and she shouted in amazement that you have a new sofa here and she had claimed to child protection that I had sold the apartment empty. Then he said that now he will leave me alone and stop teasing me. So he confessed that he has deliberately bullied me.

I called my son's teacher and told him that in the child welfare report it says that he informed child welfare that he heard from grandma that I was moving to India. The teacher said that he has not announced anything like that. Children's protection therefore already records lies in the reports during the reporting phase.

I spoke with Lohja's foster carer on the phone and she said that she does think that child protection should make a surprise visit to my sister's family because drugs are being used with the baby and a murder is being interrogated. I told this to the social workers and they did nothing. Finnish child protection does not intervene in those families that really need child protection, and I will explain this later in this report. The woman from Lohja also said that she sees going to Mexico as the act of a cornered person. An emergency will not read the law.

The social workers said that my apartment in Roihuvuori is too dangerous a place for my son to live. The official has a duty to inform the police about the crimes he hears about, and this too is an official crime if the situation is allowed to continue. Social workers have also said that foster care cannot be terminated while the situation continues at home. So I decided to move back to my ex-husband's house in Malmi and that's what I did because I also didn't want to live in Roihuvuori because my sister and her family lived next door in the crab.

Living with my ex-husband involved a risk because his parents have never accepted any of his women and his mother was a downright horrible mother-in-law. My mother-in-law's sister is a child protection worker herself and I guessed that there would be problems, but I didn't have many options.

At this point, I started filing an appeal to the Administrative Court.

I also went to the police station to file a criminal report about the deprivation of liberty of social workers. The police recorded the report and asked who makes these reports. We talked about the first report and the police stated that your son definitely does not have malnutrition if it is claimed that there is no food at home. There really isn't and there has always been enough food. The police told me to show your arm and he will prove that I am not a drug user and that the social workers can certainly write something like that. I showed my hand and it must be clear to the police that the social workers are lying. The criminal report did not lead to anything because later the police called and said that there is some parallel investigation law according to which the matter cannot be handled by the police while the matter is pending in the Administrative Court. The police lied and no such law exists.

I went to the legal aid office to talk if I could get a lawyer and I talked to one of the lawyers. He said that he can attend the trial, but he is not going to defend me after I have gone to Mexico. What do I do with a lawyer who is not going to defend me. He also said that when the social workers accuse me, I should just shut up,

* * *

My son was in Lohja for a couple of months and then he was transferred to Helsinki to Vaahterapiha reception home. There were inhumane conditions in the reception home in Vaahterapiha. There wasn't enough food. As an evening snack, only half a piece of cracker bread or half a banana was given. My son had a bruise in his eye and no one took responsibility for it; they just said that they haven't seen where the bruise came from. My son said the social worker did it.

I decided to pick my son up from the Vaahterapiha and I went to pick him up and he was in the yard when I grabbed his hand and we ran to the car. The social worker ran after us but couldn't catch us. We went to Malmi and were at home for a while, but I knew that the police were after us and a search warrant had definitely been put out.

We went to Malmi to sit in the park and thought we would go home for the night, when the police must have already gone to look at the house.  In the evening we walked back home and a police car drove by and noticed us. We caught up and talked calmly and I told that I had taken the boy, e.g. for the reason that the proceedings of the Administrative Court take so long and I would like the matter to be investigated as a deprivation of liberty in the District Court.  Arbitrary custody is included in the Finnish Criminal Code: Chapter 25 Crimes affecting freedom Section 5

Arbitrary custody of the child

If a parent, foster parent or guardian of a child under the age of sixteen or a person close to the child arbitrarily takes the child into their custody or into the custody of another aforementioned person from the person in whose custody the child is, they must be convicted, unless the act is punishable as child abduction as referred to in § 5a, for arbitrarily taking the child into custody to a fine or imprisonment for a maximum of six months.

My son was returned to Vaahterapiha and the next day magazine Iltalehti had heard about us. The newspaper read that the boy's biological mother grabbed her son from child protection and gassed him up in a car. The police were worried about whether the mother would be able to take care of herself and her son. The fugitives were found in good condition.  Mom knew what she was doing. The mother has already kidnapped her son before, when they were found abroad.

The next day there was a meeting with social workers in Vaahterapiha and they asked if I had seen Iltalehti's story. I said I am and they said these are the tabloids.  The social workers themselves have told the police that I wouldn't be able to take care of myself. The police had called the social worker and said and asked that the mother would not be charged or prosecuted for arbitrary custody, considering the boy's situation. The social workers agreed to this and no charges were brought.

The first entry in the records of the Vaahterapiha was that what is our role in this caregiving matter? The boy was taken into custody and they are still asking why. In the same entry, it was written that if cooperation is not possible and agreed to, then in that case the placement. I asked what this cooperation means, to which the social worker replied that psychiatric consultation. I went to the health center to tell the doctor everything about the situation, and the doctor still sent everything I told to the psychiatrist. I got the papers saying that psychiatric consultation and treatment is not needed. The doctor also asked and suggested if we should call grandma in the white coats.  I gave the health papers to the social worker, when he said that he would write a referral to a psychiatrist, and he did so. In the message, he had written that I thought I would find peace in Mexico, as if I were somehow suicidal. He had also written that the substance abuse problem needs to be investigated. I don't use any intoxicants and the police already guessed this, that they are lying about that too and he can prove that I don't use intoxicants. I called the doctor to whom the referral had been made and the psychiatrist said that the social worker is not even allowed to make referrals and we agreed that I would not come to the reception and the psychiatrist had informed the social worker that no one can be forced to come here.

One of the social workers at the Vaahterapiha reception home said that she sees about your son can see that he has received love from his mother. The boy is spoiled. Many have said that they have never seen a child have so many toys, Legos and children's furniture.

Sometimes my son would run away to me and during one of these runaway trips my son would say let's go visit grandma. We went to visit and grandma said that if the police come, don't open the door.  The social worker happened to call at the same time and asked if grandma knows where we are, to which grandma replied that she doesn't. There was talk of Mexico and we told and laughed about some nice things on the way and grandma asked if you had a good time there. The matter turned into an argument and we left grandma's house. Grandma had called the social worker and said that she had lied to child welfare. Nothing changed even though the other admits to lying to child protection.

* * *

The administrative court decided that the guardianship will continue. The administrative court claimed that I have not proven in any way that I have not acted as described in the child protection notices. I submitted to the Administrative Court the evidence of all receipts from Mexico and e.g. a certificate that I have not sold my apartment for nothing. The administrative court apparently destroyed the evidence. In addition, I requested an oral hearing from the Administrative Court, but I did not receive it.

We decided that we will apply for asylum, because according to the declaration of human rights, everyone who has been persecuted by the authorities has the right to receive asylum.

I looked online for asylum places in Denmark and found the Sandholm reception center of the Red Cross. We went through Sweden to Denmark and when we arrived in Helsingør we should have continued our journey by train to Copenhagen, but the last train late in the evening had been canceled and the next train wouldn't leave until the morning.  We went to a nearby bus stop and after a while a man arrived at the stop and I asked if there were any more buses at this time. I told the man that we are applying for asylum in Denmark, when he told me that he works at the Danish consulate in Ethiopia. He said we could stay with him for one night, but no more, and in the morning we would go to Sandholm anyway. We spent the night at the man's place and in the morning we went to Sandholm. There, the receptionist wondered how there was anyone from Finland here and what was happening in Finland. An interpreter arrived and we started to make a report about what happened. The official asked how I managed to come to Sandholm and asked the route, as is asked when applying for asylum. I told about the Ethiopian man, when the clerk asked how I dared to go to the man with the child. I said that he is an employee of the consulate so then you can trust. The clerk wrote on the papers that an Ethiopian man had sent me to Sandholm and told me to come. The interpreter was as surprised as I was and asked why you write such lies on paper.

I started to wonder about the activities and I googled from the Sandholm website to see what place Sandholm really is.  I found a news story that said:

There are several different kinds of camps in Denmark for refugees. One camp, Sandholm, is a "closed camp" that is forbidden to outsiders. Those refugees who flee persecution and who are still in great danger -- such as fighter pilots defecting from Iraq -- are processed at Sandholm.

To these men, the saying, "You can run, but you can't hide," is chillingly real, Gundersen says.

"The police are officially not allowed inside the camps, nor are the intelligence agencies. Many times, we are forced to protect some Iraqi defectors ourselves. I had a pilot living in my house for a few weeks with my three daughters. It was crazy. But it was the only way to protect him from the Iraqi agents who are still hunting him," she said.

"They travel between Copenhagen and Iraq at will. They spy on the refugees and defectors. Many of the refugees are abducted and killed or simply disappear. Saddam even has spies on the Danish Refugee Council. They work as interpreters to process applications and interview asylum seekers. It is so odd that this is allowed to happen. We all know who the spies are, and we are Red Cross workers," Gundersen said.

In Sandholm, they possibly thought I was a spy, etc. when they wrote lies about an Ethiopian man in the paper. I looked up the man's name online, and he was actually an employee of the consulate.

I didn't have time to file an appeal with the Supreme Administrative Court because the deadline expired when we were in Denmark applying for asylum. In Sandholm, they said to still do everything you can in Finland and if it doesn't work, then come back to Denmark. Sandholm has since been closed because human rights violations took place there and citizens demanded that the place be closed. So we didn't get to the EU court because the deadlines expired. I am quite sure that the EU court would have ordered Finland to pay compensation.

* * *

After this, the social workers made the decision that the boy's place of placement would change and that he would be transferred to the Suvilinna Children's Home in Turku.  I got information about it and went to Vaahterapiha to see the situation. There was a car ready to go to Turku and the police were called. The boy was being transferred to the car when I grabbed his hand and we started running away. The policeman ran after and shouted to stop before anything happens. I stopped and obeyed the command. The boy was taken to Turku and when I called the Turku social worker, he told me that the alcoholic social worker in Helsinki recorded that the departure to Turku was very dramatic, the boy, mother and the police all fell to the ground.  I said that the police can definitely prove that no one has fallen. That's sick lying. I still have all the custody papers and documents, and almost all the social workers' statements and records are similar lies.

After that, I applied to the District Court for a restraining order against the social workers. I had been trying to change the social workers for a long time and I told them if I should move to Rovaniemi, for example, to get rid of them. They said that even if I moved to Rovaniemi, those who have started the foster care process will remain as social workers. They have also previously said that in the notifications to child welfare, the custody process was described. In Finland, therefore, we are starting to start custody processes for innocent victims. I didn't get a restraining order.

* * *

I decided to go alone to Sweden to apply for asylum and I thought that if I get asylum alone, the family reunification will happen after that. I went to Skellefteå in Sweden and asked for asylum at the refugee center. It was said that a European is free to stay in the country and of course I knew that, but how to get the Wanted Notices removed if my son was involved and how to get my son to the country. The asylum application was not accepted. I was in Skellefteå in a detached house intended for refugees and Swedish social workers came to talk to me. They said that usually in these cases the plane ticket back to the home country is paid for, but in my case they are ready to make an exception and that it would be worth going again to ask for asylum. I went again to ask for asylum and the officer called Sandholm in Denmark and discussed the matter. The clerk said that since this torment has been going on for so long, it would be appropriate to talk to a doctor about the stress. The clerk called the police and I was taken to a mental hospital. I talked to the doctor and he first wondered what you are doing here when you look so healthy. I told everything about it and he had recorded in the papers that emotionally very receptive and cordial but in another state of consciousness and different reality. The psychiatrist also said that this whole thing needs to stop as soon as possible and get me and the boy back together.

I was flown back to Finland and taken to Aurora mental hospital. There at the reception, the nurse asked all kinds of questions, changing the questions in such a way that sometimes she asked about this moment and then about things from years ago. I answered the questions and then he said that I have to stay under observation because the things told are from different years, so  that I would be psychotic. I said that you yourself asked intrusively. I had to go to the ward where a psychiatrist did an interview. He didn't even look at me but sat with his back to me. He said that since you applied for asylum in the Nordic countries and I thought that my sister wanted to kill me, I have paranoid schizophrenia. I said can you look at the papers and evidence to which he said no. My sister has admitted to sending the threat. The psychiatrist also said isn't it good that your son is taken into care if something happens to you. I said that it can't work like this, that we will take care if something happens to me and the matter is not interfered with. The papers also stated that the problem does not affect the ability to function and that helping others is emphasized.

I was in this department for a week until a man arrived in the department with whom I started talking. I guess he fell in love with me because he kissed me. The nurses saw this and as a result I was transferred to another ward. There was a new psychiatrist who interviewed me and this psychiatrist said that I don't have paranoid schizophrenia but because I've traveled so much, in Mexico, Denmark and Sweden, I have mania and I'm manic-depressive, i.e. bipolar. However, I have never had depression, so this diagnosis is also incorrect. I was in the department for a while and then I was transferred to another hospital entirely, which is meant for clients who don't have an apartment, but the treatments have been stopped. It was better to have my own apartment than to stay in my ex-husband's house to live, because he used alcohol and therefore the place is not suitable for a child. I got an apartment from the Niemikoti foundation, which offers apartments for mental health rehabilitation, and I moved to my own apartment in Puotila. I went to the outpatient clinic to talk to a mental health nurse for about a couple of months, who stated that I was healthy and that I no longer needed to go to the reception to talk.

Such vague diagnoses and forced treatment are also a deprivation of liberty.

None of my friends who know me think I'm schizophrenic, manic or otherwise mentally ill.

One social worker told me that there are more involuntary treatment decisions in Finland than in any other country.

* * *

All legal protection measures have proven to be ineffective. Finland must take responsibility for human rights violations.

After that, I had the social workers changed, because I said that I would no longer come to any of the meetings. The new social worker at least seemed better than the previous ones, and when my son was on vacation with me, he also came to visit and brought my son chocolate, which many people think was special, that the social worker is friendly. At the same time, I started studying at a vocational school, which was continuing education. I am a professional in the printing and advertising industry, and the programs in the field, such as Photoshop, InDesign, Freehand, are updated so often that the professionalism must be constantly maintained. I asked the new social worker if she can terminate the foster care and she said it is possible. The apartment I got from the Niemikoti foundation was a studio apartment, and the social worker was of the opinion that when my son comes on vacation, the apartment is too small, and he wrote a statement to the Niemikoti foundation that they should give the family a two-room apartment. I got a new apartment, a two-room apartment from Malmi.

My son was able to go on vacation every weekend and the meetings went well and there were no restrictions on contact. There was a music festival going on in Turku and there were reportedly a lot of people in the center of Turku. My son had received permission to go to the center with another boy taken into care, but they did not return to Suvilinna at the agreed time and did not answer their phones. The Turku social worker called me to ask if you can call your son that he has to come back to Suvilinna or else he will call the police. The social workers know my son believes me. I told the social worker in Helsinki about the case and he also said that this cannot be done, that the mother is called and asked to act on a matter that belongs to the social worker.

In Suvilinna, the manager changed and a social worker came in who, in my opinion, was immediately completely unqualified for the job. There was an incident where my son was sitting in front of the store and some man had come to threaten and shout and rage, according to my son, he abused his son. My son was terrified and ran away and had not harmed anyone. My son told the social workers about it who did not intervene and then called me to call the police. I called the Turku police, who took care of the crime. After a while, this new manager called to ask why you went to report the matter to the police. The manager didn't perform his duties as he should, so of course I have the right as a guardian to call the police. The police apparently wondered why the manager did not intervene. The matter went to mediation.

After moving to Malmi, one night I went to Lucky Lady nightclub and met a man there whom I got to know and he came to my place for the night. We fell in love and he asked me to marry him a couple of weeks later. My son had wanted me to have a husband. I answered the proposal in the affirmative. The social worker found out about it and she said that if I get married she won't cancel the custody. We got married. The man was from Tunisia and was Muslim. He had a Tunisian lawyer with whom he talked on Skype almost every day. We were going to apply for a residence permit for the man and the lawyer gave instructions for that.  We had been together and married for a couple of months. We applied for a residence permit and when the clerk looked at the man's information on the machine, he asked for the immigration police. My husband's passport was taken from him, but otherwise he was released and told to come for a residence permit interview in a couple of weeks. My husband went to the interview first and then I was interviewed an hour later. At the end of the interview, the foreigner police said that yes they believe that we live together but your husband has now been taken to prison because he had an international wanted notice and the police told me that he doesn't know what my husband is accused of. It turned out that the man had sold cocaine in Italy more than two years ago, but the wanted notice had only been put out now. That, too, is a violation of human rights, that issues are only started to be dealt with years later. I didn't know much about his past.

I called my husband's lawyer and he lived in Turku.  He said that if I pay 3,000 euros, he will help my husband out of prison and suspend custody of my son.  My husband had deportation proceedings to Italy from Finland and the man had wanted a lawyer in prison and said he would use this particular lawyer. In Finland, you cannot be a lawyer if you do not belong to the lawyer association and this lawyer was not allowed to be used. He doesn't even have a license to practice law. However, he came to the courthouse, but did not enter the courtroom, he just wanted to see me. After the trial, he served pizzas in a restaurant and then drove me home in his BMW and found out my address.

He paid for train trips to Turku and said he wanted to help. He also offered me a job in his company and sent Mehiläinen to a private doctor to take AIDS tests, which he said he would pay for. Only later did I receive an invoice from the foreclosure that the lawyer had not paid. The lawyer looked at the custody documents and told me that we would go together to the parliamentary ombudsman to talk face to face because I had made written complaints there.

This contact continued for a couple of weeks until the lawyer proposed to me for sex and I did not agree and I did not feel any attraction to him and I did not want to betray my husband, so I quickly went back to Helsinki by train from Turku.

It turned out that the lawyer is a diagnosed paranoid psychopath and he told me that he has a plan for me. Now Areena has a TV documentary and program about how a lawyer has kidnapped a Finnish woman to Tunisia as a victim of human trafficking and tried to get the victim, Marissa Jaakola, to act as a prostitute.  The same program has also appeared on television.

https://yle.fi/aihe/artikkeli/2019/04/04/dokumenttiprojekti-takaisin-valoon-elokuva-suomalaisnaisen-kaappauksesta

The lawyer must have tried to do the same to me and in that documentary it is said that she is now dead.

Victims of the lawyer's actions and job advertisements can be found at this link:

https://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/t/6976859/suomalais-tunisialais-eurooppalainen-yhdistys

There is e.g. tried to kill his own daughter and ex-wife.

At that time, when we were planning with the lawyer to end the custody, I told my mother that I now have a lawyer who will help to terminate the son's custody. My mother was horrified and screamed and raged into the phone that no lawyer can investigate this matter. The question arose, what is there to hide in this story.

* * *

The social workers did not agree to the removal of the care home, and my son decided to start raging in order to get home. He had banged on the lid of the boiler in the evening and the social workers could do nothing but call the security guard. If I had said that the banging would stop now, it would have happened.  Completely incompetent employees in Suvilinna.  My son started running away from Suvilinna and when he was on vacation at my place he didn't return to Turku. He got to know other children taken into care, e.g. Oliver and Joonas, who were taken into custody for a reason. Oliver's mother was a drug addict who had been killed and dismembered.  Joonas came from an alcoholic family. .One day when my son was running away, the social worker called and at the same time my doorbell rang. My son was behind the door with his girlfriend and the social worker found out that the boy was coming home. The boy realized the situation that I was talking to the social worker on the phone and did not come in, but went out. The social worker called the police to say that my son has visited the house and asked if the official help would get the police to come. The police had said that the boy had been seen in good condition, so there was no cause for concern and they would not go looking for him. The boy has been picked up from the apartment so many times or otherwise caught on the run that they know there is nothing to worry about. The social worker had called Suvilinna in Turku and demanded that they go from Turku to Helsinki to look for my son. One social worker called and told this and said that it's absurd when you don't know where to look in Helsinki. However, other social workers from Suvilinna agreed to the search and drove between Helsinki and Turku frequently. According to the law, the social worker is not even allowed to arrest, but can only talk to persuade to go with them.

My son moved with Oliver and Joonas and together they had committed some small thefts and had been away from their placements for months. The manager of Suvilinna had gotten it into his head that my son should have a psychiatric consultation. Other employees at Suvilinna disagreed and said that it would not be necessary. My son had been caught on the run in Turku, when the manager had taken him to a doctor for examination and claimed that my son belonged in a mental hospital. My son had been taken from Turku by ambulance to Hesperia mental hospital. I was called from Hesperia and asked what the heck is all this fuss about, that a healthy boy is being transported in an ambulance from Turku. The boy was under observation for three days and it was said that he has a mild behavior disorder, but is one of the kindest behavior disorders they have seen. We held a meeting together in Hesperia with a psychiatrist and Turku social workers. The psychiatrist stated that the boy does not need to stay in Hesperia but should be free. At the same time, it was agreed that the place of placement must be changed, and my son and I demanded it. The boy said that he'd rather go to a school home because he can't stand Suvilinna anymore because for something like, for example, if he says finnish swear word vittu which in enlish is same as fuck or damn, he has to go to the room for an hour as a punishment. That's already pretty sick considering how commonly the word fvittu or uck is used. The matter is also stated in this Wikipedia article:

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vittu

Vittu is an old Finnish word that means a woman's external genitalia. Nowadays, the word belongs to the understyle, and is also used as a crude swear word.

Today, according to research, vittu is the most common curse word used by schoolchildren.

Finnish language researcher Riitta Eronen, who works at the Finnish Language Research Center, considers the word "vittu" to be a derogatory power word. According to him, it is used in the language of young people as if it were a comma and the word has lost its power, but nevertheless it is still used. Eronen thinks that young people don't know what they're doing when they hokey the word.

According to Tamme, vittu has become a particle in young people's speech and nowadays replaces the word like something. He no longer sees the sexually offensive meaning in the word. Tammi has stated the superiority of the word "fuck" as a curse word.

According to Kulonen, the inflectional forms of the Finnish language make it possible to use swear words in a variety of ways, and "Vitut I am not telling you anything" is a good example of this. Kulonen has also drawn attention to the fact that vittu acts as a punctuation mark, like capital letters, commas and periods, pacing speech. Kulonen considers the word "fuck, or vittu" used up, but still degrading, ugly and disgusting. According to Kulonen, the word contains wild teenage angst, which you can even laugh at, but he still wouldn't want his lower end to be called that name.

Psychiatrists have found that swearing helps manage pain and is good. Social workers want to take away this relief as well. The following link shows psychiatrists' opinions on swearing:

https://www.psychiatrist.com/news/profanity-can-sometimes-be-the-best-medicine-increasing-pain-tolerance-33-percent/#:~:text=Studies%20suggest%20that%20cursing%20can,to%20tolerate%20pain%20and%20discomfort.

Profanity Can Sometimes Be the Best Medicine, Increasing Pain Tolerance by ~33%

Clinical Relevance: Swearing can provide pain relief and emotional benefits

Studies suggest that cursing can reduce the perception of pain, providing a measurable analgesic effect, by as much as 33%.

The act of swearing can be a distraction, increasing an individual’s ability to tolerate pain and discomfort.

Profanity can help individuals process emotions, establish social bonds, and express their feelings in certain contexts.

In a 2009 study from Keele University, subjects were tasked with plunging their hands into a tub of freezing cold water, once while repeating a swear word and again while repeating a neutral word. Participants were consistently able to hold their hands underwater for longer when uttering the swear word. A follow-up experiment demonstrated that the increased pain tolerance that comes from verbalizing vulgarity is strongest among those who don’t swear as a habit.

The manager of Suvilinna also called me and said that I got to be angry for my son. I said that I don't need to be angry with my son because he obeys me anyway.  In child protection, children are raised in a hostile atmosphere.

The social workers threatened me with police action if I let the boy into my home while he was running away. I told him that I have sometimes seen my son outside the home and paid for food at Mc Donalds and other restaurants and that there is no need to go without food. The manager said that the boy must be driven into a tight spot. This is the operating method of child protection from the beginning in the fostering process, that people are forced into cramped conditions and distress.

* * *

I filed a complaint with the parliamentary ombudsman about the actions of Suvilinna's manager. He had also opened a letter I had sent to my son without permission. The boy had left the Turku region travel ticket at my house and the manager asked to send it as a letter. I sent the letter and the manager called that he has gone to open the letter addressed to the boy. In Finland, correspondence is confidential and letters in someone else's name cannot be opened. The leader received a complaint from the parliamentary ombudsman to read, in which case the leader had lied to the parliamentary ombudsman that he had permission to open the letter and that a memo about this would still be recorded in the database. He lied and the parliamentary ombudsman resolved the case in my favor and stated that the manager had violated my human rights. I have made several complaints to the parliamentary ombudsman and this was the first time that a human rights violation was granted.  At that time, Saxlin acted as ombudsman. Saxlin has been much fairer than his predecessor. Petri Jääskeläinen, who is currently working as an ombudsman, wrote in his blog years ago that the office of the parliamentary ombudsman decides and thinks about what everyone deserves. I wrote to Jääskeläinen that even saying that is a violation of human rights because everyone is equal and equal before the law. Jääskeläinen shut up and wrote to me that the complaints will no longer be investigated, but will be moved directly to folder Ö to be trashed.

So, my son had committed some petty thefts and robberies during his runaway travels, and they became a trial for him.  I contacted the Fredman & Månsson law firm and from there we got a lawyer for the defense. The manager of Suvilinna said that he will go to court because they are responsible for the child's development and upbringing in child protection. I said that surely you will not come to the trial that they believed. A lawyer from the Fredman & Månsson law firm called me before the trial, who again told me that I should not come to the trial. Trials are public unless they have been ordered to be secret, and I said I would definitely attend the trial. My son received a youth punishment, which practically only means that he should stay in the place of placement and should not run away from it.

* * *

My son's place of placement changed from the school home to Outamo's student home. The local social worker visited me and I asked all kinds of questions about the place. He said that they don't get punished for saying the word fuck or vittu. He said that they have zero tolerance for bullying in Outamo and the police will be called if something happens. At the same time, it was concluded that my son does not need any therapy visits because he is healthy, and all the children taken care of in Suvilinna were put in therapy. I looked online for information about Outamo and happened to notice that the place is also a nature reserve because there are flying squirrels there. I was visiting my son in Outamo and I asked the social worker if there were flying squirrels here, that it would be nice to see one as I have never seen one. The social worker said there are wild pigs here. I was amazed and found out that with his words he meant that Outamo's children are wild pigs,

My son was in Outamo for a couple of weeks when he was abused there; the muslim boy abused and the social workers did nothing. The boy called me crying and told me the situation and asked me to call the police. I called the emergency number to see if the police could come to Outamo, and the emergency center asked if the boy couldn't call them himself. I said I can't, when the emergency center said that this kind of thing doesn't happen in Finland. Outamo's zero tolerance means that children are free to abuse each other and the matter is not interfered with. A couple of weeks after this, the social worker had said, in the hearing of several children in care, that if a child is being abused, he will turn his back and not intervene.

Before my son had a trial, I went to the Criminal Sanctions Office to talk to an official and he asked about Outamo. I told him about calling him a wild pig and he said that it's rude to say that to someone's mother. I also told about Outamo's zero tolerance and the Criminal Sanctions Office said that zero tolerance means that abuses are not tolerated at all and that they are dealt with, but in Outamo this means the exact opposite.

* * *

My husband, who was sentenced to two years in an Italian prison, was released and we had written letters while in prison. I had already written to him before that I wanted a divorce. He didn't agree and didn't want to. I didn't file for divorce because there would have been a half-year consideration period and after two years of separation it is easier to get a divorce. My husband was quite messed up in prison and he started threatening to come to Finland to kill me. Sent e.g. several text messages which I went to show to the police and asked for a restraining order. There were a lot of text messages and even in a situation where I was in front of the police, I received a text message that he was going to kill me and the police said that they would not put a restraining order now. However, the man had a two-year entry ban to Finland and a five-year entry ban to Italy. He was deported back to Tunisia after the verdict. I filed for divorce and got it. It was a mistake to marry a criminal in the first place, and her intention seems to be to get a residence permit.

With these death threats, I started having panic attacks. At first I didn't realize it was a panic attack when my heart was pounding and I felt dizzy and I couldn't breathe. I thought it was a heart attack and called an ambulance. The paramedics examined my heart and said this is not a heart attack but a panic attack. After the incident, I went to the doctor because the panic attacks recurred and the doctor prescribed Opamox, Benzodiazepine. I received Opamox for another four months.  Many have wondered how so many of them were prescribed because they are hard to get because drug addicts want to use them. I don't use drugs, so that's probably why I got so many of them. I also tried to learn how to control panic attacks so that I wouldn't have to take medicine. However, the medicines ran out at some point and I went to the doctor to ask for more of them. The health center doctor said that they have a problem with the computers and the patient information cannot be seen now. I told the doctor that I'm divorced, that it might be broken heart syndrome and that my son is running away and when he returns to his foster care place and to school he's so smart that he gets 10's on math tests even though he's been out of school for months. The doctor said that this is how he would react if he were a boy like that. The doctor prescribed me Propral, a beta blocker, for a fast heart rate. I went to the pharmacy to get the medicine and took one beta blocker and started vacuuming the apartment. After a while, I started to feel really dizzy and I went to bed to lie down. Even when I lay down the dizziness didn't stop. I also started having hallucinations. I had a picture of a Hindu God on my wall and I had hallucinations that God's eyes were moving. Another hallucination was that I saw in the mirror that I had blue lips. I read through the product description of the beta blocker and it said that if you get hallucinations as a side effect of the medicine, contact your doctor immediately. I called an ambulance, which took me to Maria's hospital's emergency room. In the emergency room, the doctor examined the reactions and checked whether the basic vital functions were still functioning and there were ambiguities in them. E.g. he said close your eyes and raise your hands and you'll get dizzy. The dizziness was huge and the doctor said that I could stay under observation for him, but soon the shift will change and another doctor will come.  I was under observation for about an hour when another doctor arrived and he came to say that you are a sane person and I must not remain under observation for a longer time. I went home and my friend came there until night to watch if anything happened. Many have been horrified by this incident of beta blocker and benzos being prescribed at the same time and some have seen it as attempted murder.

Today, I no longer have panic attacks, and if I do, I can control it without medication.

* * *

Several, dozens of children who has been taken visited my apartment and I gave them food and let them sleep at night, so that they don't have to sleep on the street or in leaf litter, because Oliver and my son had also run away like that during their travels.  They told me that there is a runaway basement where several children sleep at night.

On the website of the National Union of Child Protection, it is stated that hundreds of young people escape from child protection institutions every year. As a phenomenon, beating has been talked about a lot, but in the past it has been studied and clarified very little. During the runaway, young people are often exposed to substance abuse, committing crimes and, for example, sexual abuse.

One of these children taken into care said that there is a group on Facebook called Child Protection's situation is worrying. I joined the group years ago when it was just founded. I don't remember the name of the man who founded it, but mainly the group had stuff about this man's custody dispute and smearing his ex-wife and  scanned documents from the son they took into custody. There were also pictures of how bruises had appeared on the boy whenever the boy had been with the woman. It was unclear who caused the bruises. The man himself or the ex-wife.

There was also one picture in the group where the social worker had caused bruises on the hand of a 12-year-old girl at the placement site, and the matter went to the police.

It was said in the group that social workers have also joined. group and started similar groups on Facebook in protest.

I wrote a few messages to the group and also mentioned that I have a lot of taken children visiting my apartement and then I got a friend request from a man named Ville. I chatted with him on Facebook and asked him if his child was taken too. Said it isn't. I wondered what he does in the group then. I chatted with him for a few days and he asked if we could meet and we arranged a date at my place. We were at my house for about half an hour until the doorbell rang and two 13-year-old girls, my son's friends, came to visit.  Anyway, we talked about all kinds of things with Ville and the girls and Ville told us that his ex-wife has cheated on him with his friend and their child has been left with the ex-wife. At some point in the evening, Ville left my apartment and the girls stayed at my place for the night. In the morning I noticed that that Ville had blocked me from fb and after a while one of these 13-year-old girls received messages and a friend request from Ville. The girl asked how Ville knew her name, and Ville claimed that when he was with Tanja yesterday, the girl would have told him herself. Nothing happened that apparently looked at my fb friends. I followed Ville and the girl chatting about what it was all about and it was clear that there was something fishy about it and a possible pedophile was involved. I wrote in the chat that fuck you and the girl wrote that Tanja is next to me the whole time and the chat ended.  I wrote about it. The situation of Children's Protection worries the group that a possible pedophile is in the group looking for foster children. The moderator announced that Ville flies out of the group like a ladybug. I reported the matter to the internet police Marko Fobba Forss and sent all chat messages to Fobba. both mine and the messages between the girl and Ville.  Fobba replied indifferently that the girl was not being proposed anything in those messages. I replied that I didn't have time, but it's really not normal for a 30-year-old man to send any message to a 13-year-old girl. The matter didn't go any further with the police. I've heard and read something somewhere that foster children are open prey for pedophiles when they are ready to do almost anything to get a place to stay and food. It's outrageous to join a group and prey on children from there, and it's a disease. Even more outrageous is the behavior of the internet police when they do nothing about it and let the pedophile run free.

I Googled the situation of the Child Protection Agency, which worries the group's administrator, and I found something online that he has publicly admired some Unabomber bomber. I decided to write to the administrator's ex-wife and told her about the pedophile and asked what such a group really is.  The ex-wife seemed very sincere and said, oh my, what has the man gone to do again. Social worker had instructed the woman not to publicly respond to any of that man's provocations. I was left with the impression that the administrator was the one who caused the bruises to their son.

The employees of the Niemikoti foundation came to visit me at home and I told them about what happened. The employee googled Ville and the group and said that if there are any more problems, call them and they will even evict Ville if he comes close. They said they are on my side. After a couple of days, the workers came again and now there was another sound on the clock. The employee angrily said that you don't decide about Finland's child protection. He were obviously referring to my writings in the group when he had joined there. The employee said they had previously worked in child protection. Whenever child protection comes up, it raises hostile feelings. (I no longer live in the Niemikoti foundation's apartment so that I don't have to suffer from their arbitrariness)

My sister continued to stalk and persecute me for years and every now and then she reported her senseless lies to the Niemikoti foundation.  Otherwise, I was not in contact with him.  He had once again made a report to Niemikodi and the employees came for a home visit, during which the employee said that your sister has made a report again and the employee said that he had replied to the email that it was okay. I said that it is a criminal offense to answer and give information to an outsider and I said that I would make a complaint. The employee was horrified and said that you don't complain about everything. I said it's a human right. I sent a message to my sister that if we start from the fact that we haven't seen each other in years, how do you even know where I live and my private affairs don't belong to her. I said that stalking and persecuting him is sick and it has now come under the criminal law in Finland. I said that I could write a book about my experiences. To this my sister replied that couldn't we be like sisters and friends again. I said I would think about it, but over the years he has continued his activities. His activities are permitted by the authorities.

* * *

At Outamo's boarding school, it turned out that my son has been using drugs. A drug screen was taken from him, which was positive. I asked my son why this started, and he said that there was a Youth Home on the neighboring lot in Turku Suvilinna where there were older children taken into care and cannabis was given there. In Suvilinna, it has not been noticed that the boys are in a cloud and high. Every parent would probably notice if a child has smoked cannabis, but child protection doesn't notice it. My son ended up in Outamo's substance abuse department.

Another boy taken into care in Outamo started sending threats on Facebook to my son. There were threats of at least a meter. I wrote to the boy's Facebook to stop and to tell him to smell the fuck himself. The boy's mother had told me that she herself put her son Outamo in the school because the boy sells himself to pedophiles and the boy's mother had found 400 euros in the boy's backpack. I also mentioned this matter in my message to the boy, for which reason a defamation charge was filed against me. It is even Defamation because the message was sent privately and not publicly. I received an invitation to appear at the Lohja District Court and there was an article on the internet that said that the Lohja District Court is hiding information about human rights violations. I got fined for defending my son.

So the ombudsman of the Parliament has admitted that basic and human rights violations have been violated, and such a country can no longer judge me for anything within the framework of the criminal law.

At that time, Russia had intervened in Finland's child protection and foster care because the children of a Russian family were taken into foster care grossly. Mother had been given the basics of foster care, which she didn't even understand since she doesn't speak Finnish. She had not been allowed to breastfeed her baby. Russia was outraged by this and spoke to President Sauli Niinistö about it. Niinistö only said that there are authorities in Finland that take care of things.

I decided to go to Russia to apply for asylum and I went to St. Petersburg and I didn't have a visa. I didn't know that an asylum seeker needs a visa.  I went to the Red Cross office where I was directed to another address to apply for asylum. I was told that there would not be time to process other asylum seekers because there are so many Ukrainians. It was also said that Finns have such a bad reputation that they would not be granted asylum. I didn't know what to do and I walked near the police station. A Russian man asked for a cigarette and I started chatting with him. He said let's go talk to the police together and that's what we did.  The police contacted the Finnish embassy and an employee of the consulate arrived to clarify the situation.  I told that I was applying for asylum because of the child disputes that have been featured in the Finnish media. The employee of the consulate said that I shouldn't talk about it, that they want to repatriate me back to Finland. I had to wait for the trial because I was in the country without a visa. Outside the courtroom, the interpreter filled out the papers and the papers asked if I was a policeman, soldier, etc. and the interpreter filled in the paper and claimed that I was a policeman and a soldier. I said that you don't write anything like this and I wrote the paper NJET because I don't know any other Russian words. The consulate employee said that it is up to the court to decide if I am a police officer. There were some ambiguities in the interpreter's passport and therefore he could not be used in court and the trial was cancelled. Whenever it comes to child protection in Finland, injustices and human rights violations occur in every country, especially by the Finns themselves. I went back to the Red Cross office and it said that they have sent an email to immigration to process my asylum application. I was in St. Petersburg for four months and decided to go back to Finland e.g. Because of the act of persecution of Muslims in St. Petersburg. Otherwise, the Russians were very kind to me. The Russian Immigration Service returned me to Finland by car.

* * * 

In our case, Finnish child protection has violated almost every point of human rights. Here is a list of the articles:

Finnish Constitution  law Chapter 2 - Fundamental rights § 6

Equality People are equal before the law.

No one may be placed in a different position based on gender, age, origin, language, religion, belief, opinion, state of health, disability or any other reason related to the person without an acceptable reason.

Children must be treated equally as individuals, and they must be allowed to influence matters concerning themselves according to their development.

Section 7 Right to life and personal freedom and integrity

Everyone has the right to life and personal freedom, integrity and security.

No one may be sentenced to death, tortured or otherwise treated in a way that violates human dignity.

Personal integrity may not be interfered with or freedom taken away arbitrarily and without a basis established by law. The punishment, which includes deprivation of liberty, is determined by the court. The legality of other deprivation of liberty can be submitted to the court for examination. The rights of those who have lost their freedom are protected by law.

§ 8 The principle of legality in criminal law

No one may be held guilty of a crime or sentenced to punishment on the basis of an act that was not punishable by law at the time of the act. The crime may not be sentenced to a harsher punishment than is prescribed by law at the time of the crime.

§ 9 Freedom of movement

Finnish citizens and foreigners legally residing in the country have the freedom to move around the country and choose their place of residence.

Everyone has the right to leave the country. Necessary restrictions may be imposed on this right by law to ensure the execution of a trial or punishment or to ensure the fulfillment of the duty of national defense.

Finnish citizens may not be prevented from entering the country, expelled from the country, or handed over or transferred to another country against their will.

The right of a foreigner to come to Finland and stay in the country is regulated by law. A foreigner may not be deported, extradited or returned if he is threatened with the death penalty, torture or other treatment that violates human dignity.

Section 10 Protection of private life

Everyone's private life, honor and peace at home are protected. The protection of personal data is regulated in more detail by law.

The secrecy of a letter, phone call and other confidential message is inviolable.

The law can provide for measures that are necessary to protect fundamental rights or to investigate crimes that extend to domestic peace. In addition, the law can provide for necessary restrictions on the secrecy of the message during the investigation, trial and security inspection of crimes that endanger the safety of an individual or society or domestic peace, as well as during deprivation of liberty.

§ 11 Freedom of religion and conscience

Everyone has freedom of religion and conscience.

Freedom of religion and conscience includes the right to profess and practice religion, the right to express conviction and the right to belong or not belong to a religious community. No one is obliged to participate in the practice of religion against their conscience.

§ 12 Freedom of speech and publicity

Everyone has freedom of speech. Freedom of speech includes the right to express, publish and receive information, opinions and other messages without prior interference from anyone. More detailed regulations on using freedom of speech are given by law. The law can set restrictions on picture programs that are necessary to protect children.

The documents and other recordings in the authority's possession are public, unless their publication is specifically limited by law due to unavoidable reasons. Everyone has the right to access information about public documents and recordings.

Section 21 Legal protection

Everyone has the right to have their case dealt with properly and without undue delay in a court or other authority competent by law, and the right to have a decision regarding their rights and obligations submitted to a court or other independent judicial body.

The publicity of the proceedings and the right to be heard, to receive a reasoned decision and to apply for an appeal, as well as other guarantees of a fair trial and good administration, are protected by law.

Section 22 Safeguarding fundamental rights

The public authority must secure the fulfillment of basic rights and human rights.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Article 2 

1. Each Contracting State undertakes to respect and guarantee to every individual within its territory and within its jurisdiction the rights recognized in this Convention without discrimination of any kind based on race, skin color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, descent or other status. 

2. Each State undertakes, in accordance with its constitution and in accordance with the provisions of this Convention, to take the necessary measures to implement, by legislation or other means, the rights recognized in this Convention which are not already in force.

3. Each Contracting State undertakes: 

(a) to ensure that every person whose rights and freedoms recognized in this Convention are violated has access to an effective remedy, even if the violation is committed by persons acting in the performance of their duties; 

b) to ensure that the one who resorts to such a legal remedy, gets his rights resolved by a competent legal, administrative or legislative authority or another competent authority according to the legal order of the state, and to develop the possibilities of using legal remedies; 

(c) to ensure that the competent authorities enforce decisions based on such remedies.

Article 5 

1. Nothing in this Convention shall be construed as conferring on any State, group or person any right to engage in any act or perform any act designed to nullify or limit any right or freedom recognized in this Convention to a greater extent than is permitted in this Convention. 

2. No limitation or exception to fundamental human rights recognized or in force in any Contracting State by law or other provisions, conventions or custom shall be permitted on the ground that this Convention or custom shall not be permitted on the ground that this Convention does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them more narrowly.

Article 9 

1. Everyone has the right to liberty and personal security. No one may be arbitrarily arrested or imprisoned. No one may be deprived of his freedom except on the basis of the law and in the order prescribed by law. 

2. At the time of arrest, each detainee must be informed of the reasons for the measure and immediately informed of every charge against him. 

3. Anyone arrested or imprisoned on suspicion of a crime must be immediately brought before a judge or other authority exercising jurisdiction under the law and has the right to a trial within a reasonable time or the right to be released. As a general rule, it should not be considered that persons awaiting trial are kept in pretrial detention, but the condition of release can be set as a guarantee that the person concerned will appear at the trial, as well as at every other stage during the proceedings, and if necessary for the execution of the sentence. 

4. Everyone who has been deprived of his liberty by arrest or imprisonment has the right to demand in court that the legality of his deprivation of liberty be immediately investigated and that he be released if the measure is not lawful. 

5. Anyone who has been unlawfully arrested or imprisoned has the right to compensation.

Article 10 

1. All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated humanely and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person. 2. a) Accused persons must, except in exceptional circumstances, be kept separate from convicted persons and their status as unconvicted persons must be taken into account in their treatment; b) Accused young persons must be kept separate from adults and their cases must be resolved as quickly as possible. Finland's reservation "Referring to Article 10, Paragraph 2, Paragraph b and Paragraph 3 of the Convention, Finland states that, although juvenile and adult offenders are usually kept separately from each other in Finland, it is not considered appropriate to adopt an absolute ban in order to enable flexible arrangements"

Article 12 

1. Everyone who is legally in the territory of the state has the right to move freely there and freely choose their place of residence. 

2. Everyone is free to leave any country, including their own. 

3. The above-mentioned rights may not be restricted other than as provided by law, when the restrictions are necessary due to state security, public order ("ordre public"), public health care or morals or other rights and freedoms, and are consistent with other rights recognized in this convention. 

4. No one may be arbitrarily denied the right to enter their own country.

Article 15 

1. No one shall be considered guilty of a crime based on an act or omission that was not a crime at the time of the act according to national or international legislation. A punishment that is more severe than the one applicable at the time of the crime may not be imposed. If, after the commission of the crime, a lighter punishment is prescribed by law, the offender must become a party to this.

Article 16  

Everyone has the right to be recognized everywhere as a person in the legal sense.

Article 17 

1. No one's private life, family, home or correspondence may be arbitrarily or unlawfully interfered with and no attacks may be made against his honor and reputation. 

2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 18 

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right includes the freedom to profess or adopt a religion or belief of one's choice and the freedom, either alone or together with others, to publicly or privately practice one's religion or belief in religious services, religious visits, devotional exercises and teaching. 

2. No one shall be exposed to such coercion that limits his freedom to profess or choose a religion or belief of his own choice. 

3. A person's freedom to profess his or her religion or belief can only be subject to restrictions that are stipulated by law and that are necessary to protect public safety, order, health care or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others. 

4. The contracting states of the convention undertake to respect the freedom of parents and, if necessary, legal guardians to guarantee the religious and moral education of their children according to their own convictions.

Article 19 

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion without outside interference. 

2. Everyone has freedom of speech; this right includes the freedom to acquire, receive and disseminate information and ideas of all kinds regardless of territorial boundaries either orally, in writing or in print in artistic form or in any other way of his choice. 

3. The use of the freedoms referred to in the previous paragraph implies special obligations and special responsibility. It can therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these must be stipulated by law and those that are necessary 1) to respect the rights or reputation of other persons, 2) to protect state security or public order ("ordre public"), health care or morals.

Article 23 

1. The family is a natural and fundamental community of society and has the right to the protection of society and the state.

Article 26 

All people are legally equal and entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. In this regard, the law must prohibit all discrimination and guarantee all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination based on race, skin color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, descent or other status.

Convention on the Rights of the Child

Article 2 

1. States Parties shall respect and guarantee the rights recognized in this Convention to all children under their jurisdiction, without any distinction as to the race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, wealth, disability of the child, his parents or other legal guardians , discrimination based on descent or other circumstances. 

2. States Parties shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the child is protected from all forms of discrimination and punishment based on the status, activities, opinions or beliefs of his parents, legal guardians or other family members.

Article 13 

1. The child has the right to express his opinion freely. This right includes the freedom to seek, receive and disseminate information and ideas of all kinds across borders in oral, written, printed, artistic or any other form chosen by the child.

Article 14 

1. The contracting states respect the child's right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. 

2. Contracting States shall respect the rights and obligations of parents and legal guardians to provide guidance to the child in exercising his or her rights in a manner consistent with the child's developmental level. 

3. A person's freedom to profess his religion or belief can only be subject to such restrictions as are provided for in the law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health and morals or other people's fundamental rights and freedoms.

Article 16 

1. A child's privacy, family, home, or correspondence may not be interfered with arbitrarily or illegally, and his honor or reputation may not be illegally denigrated. 

2. The child has the right to the protection of the law from such interference and humiliation.

Article 18 

1. The contracting states shall try their best to guarantee the recognition of the principle that parents are jointly responsible for the upbringing and development of the child. Parents or, depending on the case, legal guardians and guardians have the primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child. The best interests of the child must determine their actions.

Article 22 

1. States Parties shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a child who, alone or together with his parents or any other person, applies for refugee status or is considered a refugee under applicable international or national law and procedures, receives adequate protection and humanitarian assistance in order to enjoy the benefits of this Convention and other such rights recognized in international human rights and humanitarian law documents to which the respective states are parties. 

2. To this end, States Parties shall participate, as they deem necessary, in the efforts of the United Nations and other competent, intergovernmental or non-governmental organizations cooperating with the United Nations to protect and assist such a child and to trace the parents or other family members of the refugee child in order to obtain information necessary for the reunification of the child and his family . When parents or other family members cannot be found, the child must receive such protection as is given to a child permanently or temporarily without family protection for one reason or another in accordance with this convention.

Article 29 

1. The contracting states agree that a child's education should aim to: 

a) for the fullest possible development of the child's personality, gifts, and mental and physical abilities; 

b) to develop respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the principles of the United Nations Charter; 

c) to promote respect for the child's parents, own cultural identity, language and values, the national values ​​of the child's country of residence and birth, and cultures different from his own; 

d) to prepare the child for a responsible life in a free society in the spirit of understanding, peace, tolerance, gender equality and friendship between all nations, ethnic, national and religious groups and indigenous peoples;

e) promoting respect for the living environment. 

2. Nothing in this article or part of article 28 should be interpreted as restricting the right of individuals and communities to establish and manage educational institutions, provided, however, that the principles presented in paragraph 1 of this article are followed and the requirement that the education given in such institutions must correspond to the minimum level set by the state.

Article 31 

1. The contracting states recognize the child's right to rest and free time, to play and recreational activities appropriate to his age, and to free participation in cultural life and the arts. 

Article 35 

States Parties shall take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent the abduction, sale and trafficking of children for any purpose or form.

Article 37 

The Contracting States guarantee that 

a) the child is not tortured, nor treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading manner. The death penalty or a life sentence without the possibility of parole should not be imposed for crimes committed under the age of 18; 

b) the child must not be deprived of his freedom illegally or arbitrarily. When arresting, depriving or imprisoning a child, the law must be followed and these actions must only be resorted to as a last resort and as short-term as possible; 

c) a child deprived of liberty must be treated humanely and with respect for innate human dignity, taking into account the needs of his peers. In particular, a child subject to deprivation of liberty must be kept separate from adults, except when it is considered to be in the child's best interest to do otherwise. Every child has the right to contact his family by letter and visits, except in exceptional circumstances; 

d) a child subjected to deprivation of liberty has the right to prompt legal and other assistance, as well as the right to challenge the legality of the deprivation of liberty in court or before another competent, independent and impartial authority, and the right to receive a prompt decision in any such matter.

Article 39 

States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote the physical and mental recovery and social reintegration of any child victim of neglect, abuse, abuse, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, or of armed conflict. Recovery and adaptation must take place in an environment that promotes the child's health, self-respect and human dignity.

Convention Against Torture and Inhuman Treatment

Article 3 

1. No Contracting State may deport, return or extradite a person to another State if there are reasonable grounds to believe that he or she would be in danger of being tortured there. 

2. In deciding whether such a reason exists, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant factors, such as, where applicable, whether gross, flagrant or large-scale violations of human rights are persistently occurring in the State concerned.

Article 13 

Each State Party shall ensure that anyone who claims to have been tortured in an area under its jurisdiction has the right to complain to the competent authorities and to have his case promptly and impartially investigated. In order to protect the complainant and witnesses, measures must be taken to protect them from any kind of ill-treatment or intimidation arising from the complaint or testimony.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Article 2 

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this declaration, without distinction of any kind based on race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, descent or other factor.

Nor should any distinction be made on the basis of the governmental, administrative or international status of the country or territory to which the person belongs, whether this territory is independent, under a caretaker administration, without self-government or subject to any other limitation of its sovereignty.

Article 3 

Every individual has the right to life, liberty and personal security.

Article 5 

No one may be tortured or treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading manner.

Article 6 

Every person everywhere has the right to be recognized as a person before the law.

Article 7 

Everyone is equal before the law and entitled without distinction to equal protection of the law. Everyone has the right to equal protection against discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8 

Everyone has the right to effective redress in the relevant national court for acts committed against him that violate his fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution or law.

Article 9 

No one may be arbitrarily arrested, imprisoned or exiled.

Article 10 

Everyone has the right, in full equality, to be heard fairly and publicly in an independent and impartial court in the determination of his rights and obligations or in the investigation of criminal charges brought against him.

Article 11 

(1) Every person accused of a criminal act is required to be innocent until his guilt has been legally proven in a public trial, where he is provided with all the guarantees necessary for his defense.

(2) No one should be sentenced to be punished for acts or omissions which, according to national or international law, were not criminal at the time they were committed. Also, one should not be sentenced to a harsher punishment than what was applicable at the time the punishable act was committed.

Article 12 

No one's private life, family, home or correspondence should be arbitrarily interfered with, and no one's honor and reputation should be insulted. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or infringement.

Article 13 

(1) Everyone has the right to move freely and choose their place of residence within each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave the country, including their own country, and return to their country.

Article 14 

(1) Everyone who has been persecuted has the right to apply for and enjoy asylum in other countries.

(2) This right cannot be invoked when it comes to prosecutions arising from truly apolitical crimes or acts contrary to the principles and purposes of the United Nations.

Article 15 

(1) Everyone has the right to citizenship.

(2) No one may be arbitrarily deprived of citizenship or denied the right to change citizenship.

Article 18 

Every person has freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change one's religion or belief and to profess one's religion or belief alone or in association with others, both in public and in private, by teaching and practicing devotion and religious practices.

Article 19 

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and speech; this includes the right to hold opinions without interference and the right to obtain, receive and disseminate information through all media regardless of frontiers.

Article 26 

(1) Everyone has the right to receive education. Education must be free of charge, at least for primary and basic education. Primary education must be compulsory. Technical and vocational education must be universally available, and higher education must be equally open to all according to their abilities.

(2) Teaching must aim at the full development of a person's personality and strengthening respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations and all racial and religious groups and shall endeavor to promote the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

(3) Parents have the primary right to choose the quality of education for their children.

Article 28 

Everyone has the right to a social and international order within which the rights and obligations set forth in this declaration can be fully realized.

Article 30 

Nothing in this declaration can be interpreted in such a way that a state, group or private person can, based on it, consider it their right to do something that could destroy the rights and freedoms defined here.

* * * 

All this I wanted to say, so that people know what is happening in Finland and in Finnish child protection. Don't be silent about child protection issues, but share your experience publicly and appeal to the decision-makers. When people speak out, the whole system collapses. I would hope that people would peacefully write their petitions and talk publicly about their experiences.

People don't know about legal processes and how to terminate custody as stated in this article:

Children taken into care against the will of the family rarely return home - the investigator and the deputy judge are on completely different lines for reasons

Administrative rights and the Supreme Administrative Court only rarely make decisions to end care.

https://yle.fi/a/74-20071327#:~:text=Huostaanotettuja%20lapsia%20oli%20tuoreimman%20tilaston%20mukaan%20Suomessa%20vuonna%202022%20yhteens%C3%A4%2011%20477.,-Mit%C3%A4%20huostaanotto%20tarkoittaa

If a child is taken into custody without the parents' consent, the parents have only a small chance of getting the child back home.

This is clear from Yle's information request to administrative rights and the Supreme Administrative Court.

Involuntary custody is always dealt with in the administrative court. If the guardianship is approved, it can be appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court (KHO).

According to Yle's report, those who complain rarely get the custody decision overturned.

According to the information obtained by Yle, the Supreme Administrative Court has not overturned a single custody order in the past six years based on a complaint. Administrative rights also make decisions to end custody very rarely.

According to the most recent statistics, there were a total of 11,477 children in care in Finland in 2022.

- Children have certainly been taken into custody in cases where an equally justified alternative for the child's place of residence could have been a home with support measures.

Getting a child taken into care back home through the legal process is a long and challenging project, which, according to Toivonen, is certainly one of the reasons why many do not undertake it.

However, in his opinion, the court is the best place to deal with involuntary custody cases.

Deputy judge Leeni Ikonen has a completely different opinion about the place where child protection matters are handled. During his career, he has handled thousands of cases related to child protection.

Ikonen refers to the serious legal security problems in the administrative court that were raised by the Legal Security Advisory Board 20 years ago (2005). The consultation committee proposed the district court as the place of hearing.

Ikonen also brings up how the composition of the administrative court's judges in child protection cases always includes an expert member. These are often social workers, child psychiatrists and those working with child protection issues – according to Ikonen, even representatives of child protection service providers.

- The abuse of children in foster care and the billion-dollar business have been made possible under the protection of administrative rights. Administrative rights are unable to implement child protection, the core of protecting children.

Parents do not know their rights

Parents don't always know that they can complain about child protection decisions and how to do it. This may also contribute to why they are rarely complained about.

The lack of information does not only apply to complaints. According to Välimäki, many parents do not know their rights or even what they should have done differently in practice so that the child would not have been taken into custody.

It is also unclear to many what he should do in order to terminate the custody and bring the child back home.

Välimäki urges parents of children taken into care to seek legal information. It should also be required of the social worker responsible for the child's affairs, because it is his responsibility to provide information.

- Child welfare resources are insufficient, so there is not always the opportunity to provide enough information and support. Therefore, quite a lot of knowledge and activity is required from the parent.

* * *

This was my personal experience and at the end I will add cases that were still in the public domain. Child welfare does not take care of those who really need it, and the most egregious example of this is Vilja-Eerika's case, where the girl's grandmother was a social worker herself and her son Vilja-Eerika's father murdered and tortured the child with his wife.  The media has featured the murder of Jenna Lepomäki and all those involved were children taken into the care of Finnish child welfare, more about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jenna_Lepom%C3%A4ki Finnish child welfare produces children who go on rampages abroad even as adults. Suvilinna's social worker said that Juha Valjakkala alias Nikita Foughantine and his girlfriend Marita Routalammi, who committed the triple murder in Åmsele, are acquaintances and were raised by him in the institution.

Taking children into custody has been proven by scientific studies to have consequences that seriously endanger children's health and development. One of these studies is a study by the universities of Helsinki, Eastern Finland and Oxford, as well as THL, which found out what is the risk of children and young people placed outside their homes to face social difficulties and health problems after reaching adulthood.

The basic population of the study was all children born in Finland between 1986 and 2000 who were alive and living in Finland at the age of 15. There were a total of 903,951 of them. The main result of the study was that the situation of placed children, regardless of gender, was weaker than their siblings, who were not placed outside the home, on all investigated measures of well-being and health. Foster children's risk of experiencing serious social and health problems in adulthood was up to five times higher than that of their siblings who stayed at home. On the threshold of adulthood, the situation of children placed outside the home was on average weaker than the rest of the population in all areas of life studied.

It has been said about child protection, and it is also mentioned in the Child Protection Act, that child protection is responsible for growth and development. At the same time as my son, there was Tom Kokko in Outamo's boarding school, about whom articles have been written in newspapers, such as this one where Tom says that the state has caused his problems:

https://puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/timokrkkinen/vantaan-homohakkaaja-on-helsingin-sanomien-paivan-timantti/

Helsingin Sanomat (HS) published a new version of its last summer's "diamond story" about the violent criminal Tom Koko on its online service today. The story is advertised on the front page of the magazine's online version as one of the magazine's "best diamond stories". In the same advertising banner on the front page, the newspaper markets its subscription offer with the tagline "the need for facts is now greater than ever". The country's number one newspaper praises this criminal as the "Shakespeare of Vantaa", because he is awaiting his final sentence in Vantaa prison.

Why did the magazine publish this "stories" article in its "diamond story" for the second time, in which a cold-blooded gay hacker is sanctified as a sensitive beautiful soul, a great artist and a caged jerk?

HS's "diamond story" label does not guarantee anything about the story's quality or social significance.

Based on the crime and trial descriptions in the public, Tom Kokko is a hardened professional criminal and beater, for whom and his partners in crime homosexual men are human garbage, to whom you can do whatever you want because they are homosexual.

At the moment, the prosecutor demands that Koko be declared a very dangerous person and sentenced to a combined punishment, which is intended for someone who repeats a serious crime that must be considered extremely dangerous to the life, health or freedom of another person. There is no possibility of parole or supervised probation from the combined sentence.

HS's story repeats Koko's worldview, where she is a victim of society:

"The easiest way of all is to blame the child. And shit. The easiest of all is to argue on behalf of the other. And our state took care of that. – – – Mistakes are put on the young person's paper.  What the state does, they just keep silent about. It doesn't matter what the young person says. Only bad deeds are left in the light" (Tom Koko's rap rhymes).

HS describes how Kokko, a minor, abused counselors in various child protection institutions, blew up the boathouse, destroyed the institution's cars, held the counselors hostage, burned down an entire floor of the institution.

In the end, the reporter explains Koko's behavior: "Kokko was a hot-tempered, homesick child in a much too big body."

Kokko himself justifies his behavior in general: "I knew what I was doing, but I didn't know how to care. – – – I don't want to hurt, but my mind is stronger than a man" (Tom Koko's rap rhymes). A place of forgiveness?

He also blames the illusion of life created by the "cinematic world". A place of forgiveness?

HS's story shows that Kokko is a victim of circumstances. It is clear from Koko's own explanations that he feels that the "state" misunderstood him and treated him wrongly. "The state" has made him the way he is. "The state" has ruined him.

Unfortunately, the story does not reveal why Kokko drifted into the path of violence and crime in his childhood. Surprisingly, he himself gives the impression that the family has been more of a support than a derailer:

"To his mother, Kokko has always been a cheeky boy, and he would like to make his mother, the rest of his family, and his loved ones proud. It would be Koko's turn to support them, because the family has always supported Koko."

HS does not say in more detail why Kokko is a victim of circumstances despite her loving family.

* * *

Other articles on child protection that are worth reading:

The authorities reveal to MTV: Unethical, even illegal operating models observed in child protection

https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/viranomaiset-paljastavat-mtv-uutisille-lastensuojelussa-havaittu-epaeettisia-jopa-lainvastaisia-toimintamalleja/9018890

The use of shopping services has accelerated in child protection, and at the same time even illegal, unethical operating models have formed in the field. Regional administration agencies from different parts of Finland tell MTV Uutis about this. As a result of this phenomenon, companies have emerged whose business idea has been to sell social workers to municipalities and welfare areas. 

With the Organization Act, buying social workers is against the law.

According to the law, a welfare area may not be acquired from a private service provider:

1) services that include the use of public authority, unless otherwise provided by law;

2) individual and family-specific social work of the Social Welfare Act and not social emergency services.

With the law, the situation has changed so that social workers are no longer directly bought or sold to the welfare area, but now companies second social workers for positions on a short-term basis.

In this case, the social worker is formally employed by the welfare district, but the welfare district usually pays the company a fee, which may be tied to the social worker's salary and the length of the employment relationship, through the contract they have with the company. 

The official receives a salary from both private and public sources

The regional administrative agencies are told that, in the worst case, in addition to the fact that a social worker receives a salary for official work from the welfare area, he also receives a salary or remuneration from an intermediary company. Or he may have different benefits than other office holders doing the same job. The agencies give examples of the right to count commuting time as working time and the right to receive work guidance from an intermediary company.

Some of the companies providing social workers have also sold other child protection services, which raises the question of obstruction if the social worker buys services from a company with which he is employed. 

Direct transmission of this kind is not expressly prohibited in any law.

- However, it is clear that this kind of activity is very problematic, even against the law. This also applies to other areas of social work than child protection, including, for example, adult social work. But this has come to the fore in child protection, says chief inspector Päivi Ahvenus.

The supervisory authorities have found several problems in the agency. They are detailed below.

Questionable affiliations endanger impartiality

The supervisory authorities state that the social worker, as a user of public authority, has an emphasized obligation in accordance with the legal principles and accessibility requirements of the Administrative Act to take into account the requirements of impartiality and independence in his activities, as well as official responsibility, which includes liability for damages and criminal law. 

An arrangement in which the office holder is at the same time in a work-related legal relationship with both a public service organizer and a private service provider is apt to undermine trust in the office holder and the authority and may jeopardize his impartiality and independence when assessing the best interests of the child.

Not all methods have been utilized

In the past, the municipalities and now the welfare regions have the obligation to actively apply for the position of social worker for a person with the social worker's legalization and obligation to fill the positions on a permanent basis. According to the perception of the supervisory authorities, the municipalities and currently the welfare regions have not always sufficiently utilized all the available means to fill the permanent positions of child protection social work. 

- Welfare areas must develop and implement such measures and means that can ensure the availability of the necessary licensed and permanent social workers to ensure customer safety.

The social work of Child Protection is goal-oriented change work, which penetrates deeply into the privacy of the child and family.

- The social worker must take into account the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, including the fact that the child's best interests are paramount. When using public authority, the social worker acts with official responsibility and has the main responsibility for the implementation of the child's best interests, the preparation of the child protection case, the planning of services and their implementation.

Purchase service savings can be seen in the complaints

The increase in shopping services is due to the increase in the need for child protection services. In the complaints received by the authorities, it has recently emerged that the welfare regions have reduced shopping services in the hope of savings. 

Private companies are able to specialize, for example, in child protection for a certain type of customer profile, and it is typical for large national child protection companies to place children from quite far away and all over Finland. 

Institutional child protection services have been concentrated for a longer period of time. There are a few large companies in Finland that have dozens, even hundreds of child protection facilities around the country.

One of the recent trends is that the welfare regions are trying to strengthen their own services, for example in child welfare institutional care by establishing institutional units, in outpatient care by developing various support services and by tightening the criteria for external purchases.

The supervision has not gone to waste, because in some parts of the country the problem has been curbed by supervision, but in some parts of the country the problems still exist.

* * *

Strong words from the Commissioner for Children's Affairs about the charge of serious abuse of a child: "Credit is over, child protection is broken"

Tuomas Kurttila says that his confidence in the functioning of child protection is low.

https://www.is.fi/kotimaa/art-2000005653717.html

Tuomas Kurttila, Commissioner for Children's Affairs, gives his honor to child protection and the state and municipalities responsible for it in an interview with Ilta-Sanomat.

Kurttila says that her trust in child welfare activities is low.

– I'll say it straight: the credit is over. Child protection is broken. That is not fixed by the successes that very few people know about, says Kurttila.

He has recently said that he has come across cases where the child's interests are not weighted. A clear unifying factor in many cases is that the child and the family are not heard in any way, and the authorities do not get to know the family's circumstances.

The authorities did not react

IS interviewed Kurttila regarding the case pending at the Helsinki District Court. The prosecutor demands prison terms of three and 2.5 years for the parents for the gross abuse and deprivation of liberty of their child under school age.

The incident came to light after a person outside the family contacted the journalist, who in turn contacted the police. The man, who knew about the family's circumstances, had first tried to file a child protection report three times, but the authorities did not react.

According to the Ombudsman for Children, society investigates child protection issues from behind desks.

- When a citizen tells the municipality about their concerns about a child, the matter cannot be left uninvestigated or clarified, says Kurttila.

There is also teasing in the announcements

The authorized person reminds that some child protection reports can be made under pressure. 

Like gas for a broken down car

According to its director Tero Ristimäki, the trade union Talentia is pushing for a change in the law that would guarantee child protection workers an upper limit of twenty clients. Kurttila, on the other hand, states that the entire child protection system must be reformed before increasing the allocations would have an effect.

- Adding gas to a broken car does not help.

The Office of the Commissioner for Children's Affairs has close connections with legislators and top legality supervisors, but Kurttila has not observed any concrete measures, at least not from the state.

* * *

Child trafficking in the foster care business must stop

https://puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/teemuvehkala/159506-huostaanottobisneksen-lapsikaupan-on-loputtava/

At the end of last year, a shocking video appeared on the Internet's YouTube video service, in which the twin sons of an Oulu family are kidnapped from their home by the police. The boys had previously been taken into care by the social authorities in Oulu, and when the boys ran away from the foster home, police assistance was needed.

Although there are also children in Finland who really need the help of foster homes, it does not rule out the fact that this child protection in Finland is actually a cold business of private foster homes, where the interests of the children come second.

The incidents in the video clips above speak for themselves and show what the twin sons of that Kurhela family think about foster care. The younger child in the family is already having nightmares that these child abductors are coming to get him too.

That foster care business for underage children is also very reminiscent of Finnish psychiatry at will. Because then, if there is an M1 referral about a person, the police will kick in the front door and forcefully drag them to a closed department. 

In the same way that closed wards also have patient quotas, private foster homes have an agreement with local nursing homes about quotas for a certain number of children and, if necessary, unreasonable foster care decisions are made to allow this child trade to continue.

This child trafficking, practiced by sleazy prostitutes and private foster homes, must be brought to an end and brought under control. So this case of the Kurhela family was now the news bomb that was able to bring the matter to the public.

We now see what power this publicity has had. The fact that these child traffickers are now in a panic and haven't even dared to respond to the mediation requests of the family's lawyer. But instead, they have further restricted the rights of these parents to see their children.

Even though I myself have never been taken into care, I do know what kind of conditions the conditions of foster homes with weekend home holidays are like, which resemble a closed ward and even a prison.

 When children who are faced with such experiences have to fight the most merciless battle with their own mental endurance and such experiences can leave them with lifelong traumas. So this is why this foster care business in Finland has to stop.

* * *

https://puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/akisaarikoski/126583-pahuuden-maa-osa-2-lapsibisnes/

What is child business?

It is speculation with children, buying and selling children with the aim of making as much money as possible, a foster business, with Finnish child protection and children's homes and children's villages as actors. So it is completely legal in Finland, just like slavery.

In Finland, children can be bought and sold like objects or cattle.

For one child, the Finnish state pays up to 600 euros per day to the keepers of the orphanage/children's village, so it makes 18,000 euros per month and 216,000 euros per year. When orphanages are overcrowded with children, it is a business of tens, even hundreds of millions of euros for its operators. And so children are deprived of their loving homes, from the arms of loving mothers, often even with the help of the police. Children's protection has unlimited power to do evil under the cover of its hypocritical facade, to acquire child material for the needs of institutions. Violate the human rights of children and families, when every child has the right to his own father and mother. But the child's rights weigh heavily on the greed of the child protection agencies and other child traffickers. Exactly, in Finland when orphanages have to be filled with children, at any cost. Children's homes have sprung up like mushrooms in the rain, when entrepreneurs have found a tasty growth business that is not supervised by anyone. And the partners smugly and hypocritically present themselves as good, even though they are immoral, hate children and families and love money above all else.

Finland's abysmal child protection law and the incompetence of child protection officials still help this business. When you add to that the pay-for-performance system that child protection agencies have, it's no wonder that an insane amount of illegal, pointless and arbitrary adoptions take place in Finland. After all, a bonus for every care is rushing into the wallet. This is because each foster care increases the municipality's foster care factor (child protection factor) and means more money from the state. The municipality benefits many times from taking care, this is the hidden truth in this country of hypocrisy and self-righteousness, which is why it can be called the country of evil.

Here in Finland, when immoral and down to the core evil people play their roles as good ones. That is, child traffickers.

In the foster care business, i.e., in the child trafficking business, illegal foster care is done and many actors in the field make money from children, such as Finland's child protection, where social workers receive bonuses for every foster care, as well as family workers who get bonuses for pointless child protection notifications, then there is money to buy new cars and summer cottages. The big beneficiaries are also the children's homes, which in their greed for money greedy for more and more children's material with which they then bill the state for subsidies. Children are also tortured in orphanages, mercilessly exploited both sexually and violently, and subjected to merciless subjugation. For them, the child is just material to make money. According to my research, subjugation of children in orphanages and sadism towards them is everyday. as disciplinary measures, children are made to stand in freezing snow for hours in their bare clothes, they are subdued by being suffocated and wrapped in a carpet, they are raped by the staff, orphanages even have a cell for children. We can talk about children's prisons or children's concentration camps, if things are called by their proper names. Child welfare in Finland is a result-responsible business where taking into custody and receiving child welfare reports are rewarded.

I could even throw the question in the air, is the social worker of the month the one who has received the most cares in the month? Because the foster care factor (child protection factor) increases with each foster care placement, and that in turn increases the subsidies paid by the state to the municipalities. The municipality thus benefits to a large extent from each foster care, in addition, children's homes and foster care places pay the municipalities part of the support they receive from the state. So, contrary to what the masses think, foster care and often also other family support measures are profitable activities for municipalities. In Finland, we have come to a situation where new children's homes and children's villages are popping up like mushrooms in the rain, and institutions need a children's march to receive subsidies from the state. The establishment of new and ever-new institutions creates a need to fill them, which is why an ever-increasing number of children are cared for in Finland every year. Business has to grow and this business cannot be restrained by any entity. According to my information sources, children are not returned to their parents even on public holidays, whether they are placed in foster care or taken care of, because it would be bad for business, state subsidies would be cut off on those days, especially when public holidays still pay multiple subsidies to institutions.

This is a matter of great national shame.